Wednesday, February 09, 2011

Innit.






I once overheard a colleague and former film student say "No good films ever come from England". A stupendously ignorant claim, as Time Out London's terrific list of the 100 Best British Films suggests. Their list - and the many contributors individual lists - are a good reminder of the cinematic traditions of the UK and the richness and breadth of films produced here over the decades. For some reason, they ignored me, but I love a good list, as regular readers will know, and so, in no particular order, a Top 10:

(I'm excluding the likes of Blow Up and Barry Lyndon, which would both breeze into this list, since they're directed by foreigners, and would therefore seem to be about as British as, say, An American Werewolf in London)

Bad Timing (Nicholas Roeg, 1980)
Roeg's most challenging and rewarding film, elliptical, disturbing and erotic, it's an amazing piece of editing as style, with Roeg shuffling scenes, time frames, moods and emotional states to powerful effect.

Wonderland (Michael Winterbottom, 1999)
One of the only films to truly capture modern London, without tourist landmarks or mockney Gangsters, but in all it's beautiful energy and occasional desolation, Winterbottom's multi-character drama is lovely, brilliantly acted and benefits from one of Michael Nymans greatest scores.

Hunger (Steve McQueen, 2008)
Devastating, arty yet accessible, beautiful yet horrifying. Fassbender is extraordinary.

Nil By Mouth (Gary Oldman, 1997)
Grim but brilliant, Oldman takes what he learned from Mike Leigh and Alan Clarke and makes a social realist drama set in working class South East London, confronting big issues like domestic abuse without a hint of a flinch, and all of it is cinematic, remarkably visceral and visually exceptional.

Went the Day Well (Alberto Cavalcanti, 1942)
A subtle, darkly funny satire on the nature of Englishness and English self-image and also a thrilling WWII action thriller with some shocking scenes, nicely handled by Cavalcanti.

The War Game (Peter Watkins, 1965)
Watkins virtually invents a genre and creates a thrilling piece of cinematic propaganda in the process. Traumatically frightening and incredibly powerful, too.

Sexy Beast (Jonathan Glazer, 2000)
The best New wave British Gangster film, tipping a hat to Frears' great The Hit but entirely new with it's mix of moods and sub-genres, its moments of fantasy and Glazers stylish command. Ben Kingsley: awesome.

The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (Michael Powell, 1943)
Any one of six Powell and Pressburgers would do, but this is my favourite, a sweet comedy on the life of a man and a Nation. Ravishing, too, like all their work.

Billy Liar (John Schlesinger, 1963)
The least-dated of the kitchen sink films of the 60s and more universal in it's account of a dreamer planning an escape he'll never attempt. A great sense of place, too, and the best performance Tom Courtenay ever gave. Julie Christie doesn't hurt, either.

The Hill ( Sidney Lumet, 1965)
Brutal, remorselessly powerful stockade drama. Lumet was always happiest with his camera focused on faces, and this showcases that powerfully. Connery leaves 007 behind fully for the first time.



An Alternative 10 it hurts too much to leave unmentioned:

Winstanley (Kevin Brownlow, & Andrew Mollo,1975)

Elephant (Alan Clarke, 1989)

Distant Voices, Still Lives (Terence Davies, 1989)

Radio On (Chris Petit, 1979)

Witchfinder General (Michael Reeves, 1968)

Bill Douglas Trilogy (Bill Douglas, 1972)

Excalibur (John Boorman, 1981)

Mona Lisa (Neil Jordan, 1984)

A Hard Days Night (Richard Lester, 1964)

Accident (Joseph Losey, 1968)

Labels: , ,

Sunday, January 02, 2011

Count for the Down: My 2010 in Cinema

Somebody asked last year why I never go for a reverse Countdown on my top 10. So I thought I'd give that a go this year. Enjoy the crippling suspense.
So: All 2010 UK releases, from 15 to 1, with some also-rans and interesting failures below:



15. Greenberg (Noah Baumbach) -
Opening with a mini Rohmer movie following a seemingly aimless young woman through the ordinary hours of her days, Baumbach's character study-cum-comedy goes on to introduce its titular character and becomes something else altogether. How many films devote so much time to creating characters flawed and loathsome the way Ben Stiller's Roger Greenberg is? And manage to remain interesting, funny and even moving? For while we may cringe and laugh at Greenberg's intractability and stubborn insistence on being awkwardly himself, he is a recognisable human being, his interactions brilliantly authentic and truly felt. I love how Baumbach textures his world - his use of pop music is fantastic, as the Steve Miller Band track which opens the film shows best, and Harris Savides' lovely cinematography presents an LA just slightly askew from the one we are accustomed to from a thousand tv shows and movies. Here LA is bright yes, but oddly bleak, as our protagonist is frequently isolated in big frames, most stunningly in the early shot finding him awkward and alone at a party in a big backyard.
Stiller is splendid, twisting his nervous energy into something sad and damaged. Some of the moments of comic awkwardness are masterful, and yet the central relationship is curiously affecting, despite Greenberg himself coming across, ultimately, as a bit of a heel. At least he's an interesting heel..



14. White Material (Claire Denis) -
Claire Denis' amazing hot streak continues with this study of the effects of an armed revolution in a Francophone African country upon some colonial plantation owners. As always with Denis, its breathtakingly beautiful, from first shot to last - she has a fabulous eye. But her storytelling here is less elusive than it has been on occasion; the narrative is still elliptical and oft dreamlike, but the plot moves at a fair clip, and there is an impressive sense of dread and tension throughout. Her use of a shuddery handheld camera in some over-tight close-ups in the early scenes throws you off and recovering any equilbrium is never allowed; with a flashback structure and shifts in POV maintaining the unease of the viewer. The subtle - and not so subtle - digs at colonial exploitation, and indeed native brutality - are impressively controlled, and Isabelle Huppert is exemplary, as ever.



13. The Way Back (Peter Weir) -
Not for Peter Weir the spectacular, attention-grabbing money shot, no. His focus is solely on storytelling, and his mastery is unquestioned and exceptional. This historical endurance epic is beautifully mounted, gripping throughout its gruelling length, and refreshingly old-fashioned in its concentration upon characterisation and story.
Seven men escape a Soviet Siberian Gulag during the Second World War, and begin a long trek to freedom, thousands of miles across Mongolia and Tibet to India. The supporting characters - the likes of Colin Farrell and Ed Harris - are more interesting
than Jim Sturgess' lead, but Weir's understanding of this sort of Boys Own material is matchless, as Master & Commander and Gallipolli have proved in the past, and he makes this a great old yarn, immersive and intense, always intelligent and interesting, and magnificently well-made. He also makes some points about the horrors of totalitarianism and the comforts of faith and friendship, but never at the expense of his tale.
This is the kind of film that a 10 year old could enjoy just as much as an 80 year old, which is a rare quality these days, and Weir is one of the few Directors truly capable of making such Cinema. Long may he continue...



12. Centurion (Neil Marshall) -
If its genre thrills you're after, B-Movies are where its at. They do what they do without the bloat or pretension or excess of the bigger, more expensive Hollywood blockbusters. Neil Marshall's chase Western (replacing American Indians with Picts and Cavalry with Romans in Scotland) is a case in point. Roman legionaires flee Picts. 97 minutes. Thats it.
Yes, its full of cliches, but Marshall loves his cliches, embraces them, invests them with real feeling, and so they work. Yes, it rips off tons of other, better films, but Marshall understands why the elements he steals work, and he uses them cleverly.
Its a 70s-style allegory for whatever conflict you like - Vietnam/Afghanistan/Iraq - but really all its concerned with is forward momentum and butchery. The action scenes are incredibly bloody. Lead Michael Fassbender is something special - a great actor (see Hunger for proof) and also a leading man capable of credibly carrying an action movie, and he has the credible support of the likes of Riz Ahmed, a ripe Dominic West having a high old time and a dour Olga Kurelyenko as the implacable villainess.



11. The Social Network (David Fincher) -
Aaron Sorkin makes every story the story of a boys club. But he writes stories of boys clubs so well, I can't complain. Here he takes a modern subject - Facebook, the most modern subject - and sort of ignores it, concentrating instead on classical dramatic subjects: friendship, rivalry, greed, betrayal. In doing so he is able to comment obliquely on the way one geek made us all geeks, everyone reduced to staring at a computer screen. There are problems: halfway through the characters are all reduced to ciphers, it seems, the fast-talking semi-autistic Facebook crowd led by the wonderful Eisenberg, who I think makes Zuckerberg slightly less vile than Sorkin's script suggests, the wounded puppy dog of Andrew Garfield's Eduardo, who exists in the last act only to be hurt over and again, Timberlake's cartoon villain, but Fincher's slick, chilly stroytelling makes it all flash by in a ridiculously entertaining jiffy. Its major flaw - more apparent on a second viewing than a first, when its dazzle is so distracting - is the shallowness of its appeal. There seems to be little beneath Sorkin's wordplay and Finchers smooth control, little meaning, little meat. Its appearance at the top of countless Critics Polls may seem somewhat confusing, until one considers that this is a film about geeks and loners, concerned with geek hierarchy and vengeance. Critics and bloggers saw a movie about themselves, and they love nothing better...




10. The Headless Woman (Lucretia Martel) -
Lucretia Martel is a phenomenal talent, of the type that has seen her become one of the major figures in Contemporary World Cinema after only three films. This disturbing, unusual drama may be her best.
A middle class woman from the Argentine interior hits something in her car. Thinking it was a person, she drives on. But the psychological effect of the incident seems to shake her loose from the world and she floats in a haze of guilt through her affluent, privileged life, following her daily routine; going to work, seeing her lover, gossiping with her friends and family. Only all of it has been given a new tint by the car accident, the banalities of everyday life recontextualised by violence, death, deception.
Martel uses this to consider the morality of modern Argentine life - the way the class system forces servants into such an uncomfortable yet anonymous intimacy with their employers, and indeed, the very fact of the class systems existence, the cosy moral avoidances of a bourgeois Argentinean couple and what happens when they are confronted with a moral imperative they cannot ignore (sort of; turns out they basically ignore that too), together with a sidelong look at the strains and strengths of an extended families bonds.
Martel's visual style is astounding, her compositional sense isolating her protagonist in shallow focus to emphasise her widening distance from her servants, family and friends, her lighting generally painterly and lovely, her camera gliding smoothly through complex. That combined with fantastic sound design - many scenes contain almost nightmarish ambient soundscapes - make the film something of a darkly atmospheric headfuck that stayed with me for days afterwards.



9. I Am Love (Luca Gaudagnino) -
Its a wonderful thing to see a Director arrive fully-formed, and though this is Gaudagnino's third film, it feels so thrillingly poised and fresh that it is the first time the true extent of his talent has been revealed. A big, old-fashioned family saga, all of the elements are superb - a layered script full of ambiguity and telling observation, perfectly judged performances, lovely cinematography, dynamic use of some of John Adams' music, and most especially Gaudagnino's direction, which somehow combines both stateliness and sensuality. The story concerns the wife of a Milanese Magnate who falls in love with her son's friend and how her feelings - she is the I of the title - enrich her rigid existence and ultimately destroy her family. So yes, its a story about rich people enduring emotional crises in opulent surroundings, bourgeois cinema at its most bourgeois. But Gaudagnino is aware of the dangers of this type of tale, and his camera dissects these people, noting their flaws and prejudices as well as offering some sympathy for the pain the story inflicts upon them. His camera is a marvellous observer; attentive to every nuance in every scene and alive to the sensual pleasures of food and sex in a way I have never really seen before in cinema. He composes his frames intelligently and elegantly and always trusts his story - this is an unabashed melodrama, Adams' music only underlining its operatic dimensions. Swinton is magnificent, as she so often is.



8. The Road (John Hillcoat) -
Cormac McCarthy's book is perhaps the only novel of the last few decades that I can imagine being told as an oral story around a campfire hundreds of years from now. It has that sort of mythic heft and simplicity: a man and a boy walk through a ruined world. As such, I'm sure there will be other attempts at adapting it. But I cannot imagine any of them doing as fine a job as John Hillcoat does here. His film is beautiful and horrifying, grim, tense and moving. It is always enthralling. Joe Penhall had an easy job, in one way; all of the dialogue and narration come verbatim from the novel. Viggo Mortensen and the boy are both great, as is the photography and score, altough that does stray into sentimentality on one or two occasions. But most impressive is the fact that the film gets the book, and does it a sort of justice. Whether I can ever bear to watch it again is another story entirely...




7. The Secret In Their Eyes (Juan Jose Campanella) -
This slick and engrossing Argentine thriller somehow triumphed at the Oscars to win Best Foreign Language film, beating out the vastly superior A Prophet and The White Ribbon in what was an exceptionally strong field. And while its not a patch on either of those masterpieces, it is a fine film, combining its generic elements seamlessly with its emotional narrative of a love story that never-quite-was bubbling to the surface once again 25 years later. It stars the great Ricardo Darin and plays like a Classic Hollywood thriller made for grown-ups, only even better, because it has excellently drawn characters, a script rich in great one-liners and speeches and is full of finely-observed details. Its also brutal, dark, disturbing and finally quite moving. The manner in which it allows the awful realities of late 20th Century Argentine History to colour the plot is subtle and hugely important to the impact of key plot elements: this is a film which links politics to violence, but never explicitly or stiffly.
Whereas most Argentine films feel low or at least medium budget, this is classy and well-made throughout, Director Juan Jose Campanella showing some great chops, particularly in the amazing sequence where the police hunt a suspect at a Football match, made to seem as if it was done in one seamless awesome take. Darin, one of world Cinemas great Movie Stars, is, as ever, superb.




6. Valhalla Rising (Nicolas Winding Refn) -
Unlike anything else I have ever seen, Refn's film is a Viking epic, an action film, a sci-fi tale of exploration and alien encounter, slow cinema, and a consideration of faith in extremis. It vaguely resembles much other work in one element or another: there are traces of Tarkovsky and Malick, and some of Herzog's Aguirre the Wrath of God and a little-seen indie from a few years ago called Severed Ways alongside the definite genre touches - Refn designs some scenes to play out like they are in a horror film, and his action scenes betray the influence of Kurosawa. It is also extraordinary: breathtakingly beautiful, maddeningly slow and obscure, sickeningly violent. Some will see it and find it empty and pretentious, others will sense greatness in its hypnotic visual poetry and Refn's slow narrative. I was utterly transported. Mads Mikkelsen deploys his movie star charisma in a wordless role and carries the whole thing along, and the sound design - that howling wind, the ambient music - is almost as arresting as the awesome photography. The only thing preventing it placing even higher in this list is the suspicion that Refn didn't really have much in mind when he made it, and it is immaculately executed but probably meaningless. But despite that, to quote an old Time Out review of Once Upon a Time In the West: Critical tools needed are eyes and ears. This is Cinema.



5. Dogtooth (Yorgos Lantimos) -
Funny, disturbing, oddly erotic, baffling allegory of, well, whatever you want. Political dictatorship, organised religion, the power of the media? A man and woman in modern Greece keep their (grown-up) children prisoners in their house through the propagation of a series of lies about the state of the outside world and its manifold horrors and dangers: cats are dangerous killers, airplanes are the same size as toy planes. The way this affects the development of the children is the meat of the narrative, but the frequently hilarious details of the parents deceptions are just as important. Such a simple idea, so well executed. The direction - controlled, patient, sometimes painterly - is inspired.




4. City of Life & Death (Lu Chuan)-
In his 1961 review of Gillo Pontecorvo's Holocaust drama Kapo, then critic (now much-lauded Director) Jacques Rivette did not summarise the plot or give a close reading of the aesthetics except to describe one scene and more specifically one shot: "Look however in Kapo, the shot where Riva commits suicide by throwing herself on electric barbwire: the man who decides at this moment to make a forward tracking shot to reframe the dead body – carefully positioning the raised hand in the corner of the final framing – this man is worthy of the most profound contempt."
Lu Chuan's City of Life & Death made me think of Rivette's criticism, which is raised whenever a Holocaust film or any film about real-life instances of man's inhumanity to man is released.
This film is a somewhat impressionistic portrayal of the rape of Nanking, one of the great war crimes of the Second World War and a source of continued tension between China and Japan to this day. The first half is an elliptical, almost dreamlike, floating account of the Japanese conquest of the city, full of ferocious battle sequences and unwatchable mass murder. The second half shows the way the Japanese ran the conquered, half-destroyed city: by executing hundreds of civilians, sytematically raping women and throwing children out of windows.
It is often difficult to watch so much unending brutality, and this is where Rivette's criticism is relevant, for Chuan's film is also incredibly beautiful. The sumptuous black and white photography summons up a series of indelible, unforgettable images: small boys playing war with abandon in the ruins, surrounded by corpses, mere seconds after the firefight they just participated in has ended; a chapel full of keening, terrified refugees shrinking from a handful of Japanese soldiers ; the tips of executed mens heads above the sand as their executioners dance around them, flattening the grave.
Chuan is a new sort of Chinese filmmaker, combining the depth and artistry of the 5th generation with the technical mastery of a modern Hollywood director, and his approach here is radical. He does not linger too long on any one character, his narrative always moving along, observing all, context developing as the story progresses. And yet he is even-handed - the film has been massively controversial in China due to the humanity it allows its Japanese characters.
I can't agree with that criticism or with Rivette. This is a profound, magnificent , difficult film.




3. Still Walking (Hirokazu Kore-Eda)
For a film by a leading Japanese filmmaker to so openly address the legacy of Ozu through a modern family drama with obvious echoes of Tokyo Story is a bold move. But Hirokazu Kore-Eda, a half-dozen films in to his career (most of them frustratingly never released in the UK) has an established, distinctive voice of his own, and he has made Still Walking an absolute triumph. So many films attempt to wring drama out of an everyday family gathering only to find themselves peddling in a sort of downbeat soap melodrama (Mike Leigh, I'm looking at you). But Kore-Eda avoids this by a quiet insistence on the truthfulness of his characters and their scenes together. Nothing much happens on a plot level, but the story is all in the pauses, the unseen facial expressions, the arguments which start but never climax, the non-sequiters and jokes, the misunderstandings and unspoken sentiments. The story follows a family gathering for the memorial of the death an adored eldest son twelve years before. His younger brother returns to his parents home with his wife, widowed with a young son, while his elder sister comes with her loud husband and children. Meanwhile their mother takes solace in religion and gossip and their father, a retired doctor, nurses resentments and gripes but never lets any emotion show through his grumpy facade.
They eat, chat, visit his grave, eat some more, bathe, chat. It is sublime. Delicate, always realist and more moving because of that, it is a snapshot into the life of three generations in all their tensions, frustrations and joy. Each of the Kore-Eda films I have seen has been rich with emotion, and this is no different. The cast all seem effortlessly real - testament to Kore-Eda's embrace of improvisation as well as the beauty of his script and understated, disarmingly simple direction. It came out in Japan in 2008 and he's made two films since, which is very good news if they ever get released here...




2. A Prophet (Jacques Audiard) -
Audiard's film is outstanding, a remarkable triumph. Somehow, here, and in his last two films, he has shown that he is capable of the rawest of realism and a you-are-there immediacy, and yet this film has some sublime grace notes, moments of silence and poetry and great beauty. Telling the story of a young man imprisoned at 19 for a minor offence who works his way up through the political criminal power structure inside through cunning and opportunism, it is gripping literally from the first shot to the last, the tension rarely slackening. It possesses all of the requisite qualities of the prison and gangster genres and yet is so much more. It functions as a criticism of French penal law, a riveting crime story with a couple of superb, brilliantly mounted set pieces, and an intriguing and sensitive character study. As such, debutant lead Tahim Raki is excellent. Charismatic, and brooding, he suggests the boiling, always whirling thoughts beneath the placid gaze of his young hero, and his intensity more than matches Nels Arstrup's moody Corsican gang boss. The prison itself is just as powerful and interesting a character in the film as either of these protagonists - vividly evoked by Audiard's roving, intimate handheld camera. Audiard has joined a small band of Directors who have made wholly satisfying genre cinema which is so fine it transcends its genre. A Prophet is that good.




1. Carlos (Olivier Assayas) -
Setting aside the politics, the approach to history, the glamour of the violence and the globetrotting for a moment, I love Assayas as a stylist. As befits a director who admires Michael Mann and Hou Hsiao Hsien and Vincente Minelli, Assayas is a stylist whose ability to infuse his scenes with a sensual charge is vital to the success of his films. The very first minutes of Carlos bear this out; the first shot is of a man rising naked from bed, a woman beside him. He dresses in the gloom and she sits up to smoke. You can smell that room, the chill on their skin, the warm sheets. The man meets a violent fate outside and that event is given weight by the reality of what has preceded it; this sets quite a tone for Assayas' Epic.
The next scene finds the title character arriving in Beirut, and again that city is beautifully, swiftly evoked, a whirl of colour, the back of a taxi drivers head. We are located in this narrative already, we are there with this young, cocky Venezualan who wants to head his own cell of terrorists in Europe. Almost 6 hours stretch before us.
And they are the quickest 6 hours of cinema I have ever experienced. Part of a small but important group of films seemingly influenced by the likes of The Wire (I would suggest that Soderbergh's Che and Fincher's Zodiac are other high-profile examples of this school of cinema) to adopt a sort of Epic Intimate Historical realism, cataloguing events with little authorial viewpoint made overly explicit, allowing the flow of history to develop its own rhythm and meaning, Carlos benefits by its superb, innately fascinating choice of subject matter and its classy pedigree.
The central passage - Carlos' 1975 attack on and seizure of the Vienna OPEC conference - is a riveting, pacy, brilliantly made mini-movie of its own, and it is often the tangents and solos of the material that bring its long stretches to life; Angie's escape from the "Revolution", Nada's fate, and Carlos' acquiring some middle-aged flab and bourgeois certainty in Budapest. But it is Edgar Ramirez's spectacular performance which holds the whole enterprise together. Ramirez portrays a complex man, passionate, intelligent and flawed, aware that sometimes he was shallow and weak but also vain and sensitive to his image. The scene in which Carlos first murders a man - a long, sweaty suspense set-piece - brings out the best in him as we see it all dance in his eyes through his mounting fear and exhilaration. But he and Assayas ensure that Carlos' private life is just as interesting as his "career". His many women and travels, his difficult relationships with various colleagues, all made human and grippingly real in this telling.
We are with his Carlos throughout, maturing from ambitious freedom fighter to symbolic legend and beyond. The rest of the cast match Ramirez all the way, and Assayas' direction is always calm and stylish, assured and flawless in its capture of tone and atmosphere. For such a big undertaking, its a remarkably coherent work, Assayas' use of a superb Post-Punk Soundtrack and his stylish storytelling giving it an easy accessibility surprising in a film with such a complex story containing multitudes of characters and locations.
A good sign; writing about it makes me want to watch it again, right now.


Almost, not quite, interesting but bad, or not good enough:

The Kids Are All Right (Lisa Chodolenko) -
Why has American comedy largely gone down the path it has? I mean the comedies made by Hollywood studios, with big stars and high concepts and a strange mix of leftfield and broad humour. The success of the big comedies of the late 70s and early 80s seems somehow to blame, and the major casualty is the adult comedy. That can be a difficult term, so lets say I mean the type of comedy which takes place against a real setting, in something resembling the real world, with recognisablly human characters at its centre. Woody Allen, to his credit, has been making adult comedies for decades now, as have the Brookses, James L and Albert. Not too many young directors seem to be emulating these men though. Lisa Cholodenko is. Her last film but one, the sublime and underseen Laurel Canyon, had moments of sharp comedy, but was a relationship drama. The Kids Are All Right treads more evenly between comedy and drama.




The Town (Ben Affleck) -
Another mournful Bostonion crime drama from Ben Affleck means another triumph: the Town is that rare Hollywood production; a genuinely classy and grown-up genre film. Affleck knows to hire strong collaborators: a cast including Pete Postelthwaite, John Hamm (whose handsome charisma balances the film, preventing it from becoming a wholesale glorification of the criminality it depicts), Jeremy Renner, Rebecca Hall and Chris Cooper; and photography by Robert Elswit mean that his film is always good to look at. It may at base be a load of old macho rubbish, but the script is solid, the characterisation meaty, plausible, and Affleck handles the action scenes surely so that they provide muscular surges of excitement. Engrossing and serious, the film creeps up on you; I was surprisingly moved by the ending, because without knowing it I had come to care about these characters. A critic (Guy Lodge?) wrote that if Eastwood had directed it, it would have been acclaimed as a masterpiece, and hes right. As it is, this is better than anything Clint's done in a long time...


Toy Story 3 (Lee Unkrich) -
Pixar: Magicians. But: not as smooth in its storytelling as (the virtually faultless) Toy Story 2, for all that it is a tremendously moving experience. How they can engineer films that are so emotional, consistently funny - and funny in all shades, from slapstick to satire, and verbal wit to the broadest of stereotypes - while also delivering a steady rolling wave of incredible and inventive action sequences just about defies belief. We are blessed to live in this Pixar era.




Alamar (Pedro Gonzalez Rubio) -
The closest of all these films to cracking that list of 15, this is a wondrously pure & simple semi-documentary rhapsody of the ocean, the love between a father and a son and the glory of the natural life. Absolutely beautiful, and quietly moving too.

Up In The Air (Jason Reitman) -
The most middlebrow film I've ever seen.




Enter the Void (Gaspar Noe) -
Gaspar Noe and his relentless need to rub our noses in it. Hes never seen an aborted fetus in a bloody kidney dish he didn't feel the need to shoot in close up. Or a traumatised teen fellating a japanese salaryman in a fire escape he couldn't observe for a minute or so, or a sex scene he couldn't "improve" with a shot from inside the vagina. In saying that, this film is Pure Cinema, an awesome sensory experience, and has one of the best credit sequences I've ever seen. Noe is worth all of the unavoidable issues his films drag along with them, and this has to be seen, in the biggest, loudest screen available....


Ondine (Neil Jordan) -
Jordan's best in a long long time. Doing what he does best - an adult fairytale with a mystical sense of beauty and poetry mixed with pulp storytelling. Farrell - enjoying a renaissance since he started doing character parts and stopped trying to be a Hollywood lead - as good as he's ever been, Chris Doyle photography, Sigur Ros music and a happy ending. Shouldve been a bigger deal than it was.




Agora (Alejandro Amenabar) -
A cerebral, relevant and cinematic Epic from Alejandro Amenabar, Agora is that rare thing in modern spectacle cinema: a film of ideas. Amenabar examines religious extremism and piles up the parallels with our world while also devoting lots of time to issues of philosohy and astronomy. But his film never stints on its own Epic trappings, and it is a handsome and fascinatingly detailed recreation of Roman Alexandria without recourse to empty CGI showcase. The balance between the rhetoric of the scholarly debates and the violent action of the religious strife that sweeps all away is kept beautifully organic by a filmmaker always true to himself. Rachel Weicz is great in the lead.


The Killer Inside Me (Michael Winterbottom) -
Casey Affleck confirms the suspicion aroused by Assassination of Jesse James, Gone Baby Gone and Gerry thats hes the great American actor of his generation. And though Winterbottom gets as close as anyone ever has to a real adaptation of Jim Thompson, he still misses. Good though his film is, it lacks some of the savagery, some of the pain and queasiness of Thompson. Its a little too intent and deliberate in its period set dressing, in its gingham and vintage automobile glory, for Thompson's brute lyricism. But some things are always there with Winterbottom - his fine eye and sense of rhythm, his ability to capture what feels like the real world, Our world, and his way with actors (Jessica Alba, Kate Hudson, Simon Warner and Elias Koteas all lend Affleck fine support).




Black Death (Christopher Smith) -
in what would make a great double-bill with Valhalla Rising, Christopher Smith's medievel horror-western-thriller follows a group of knights during the black death in search of witchcraft and necromancy into a town seemingly untouched by the plague. Smith is a bright young UK genre talent and the accomplishment and power of this, his fourth film, really surprised me. It is thrillingly dark, unafraid to cover some weighty thematic ground, and yet founded on strong, clear storytelling redolent of classic Hollywood filmmaking. That the film also refers to Witchfinder General, The Devils, The Wicker Man and even Andrei Rublev - and yet always remains distinctively its own beast - is a testament to Smith's growing skill as a director. Each of his films has been a marked improvement on the last. Here he displays a great eye, finding some arresting imagery in his story, a good ability with his cast, and control over atmosphere which remains taut and eerie throughout. A film which deserved better than it got in the UK.


The Maid (Sebastian Silva) -
A lovely, perfectly observed little story of the maid to a bourgeois family in modern Santiago and her struggles with ageing, loneliness, unwanted competition and semen stains on adolescent bedsheets.




The American (Anton Corbjin) -
I love an existential Hitman movie. Echoes of Leone and Melville abound in Anton Corbjin's piece of designer pulp. Actually, it only gives in to the tug of convention in the last act, when the gunplay begins. Until then its quite spare and atmospheric, a 70s-style portrait of a lonely American enduring a European Winter with the help of a beautiful Italian prostitute. Yes, that is an unbearably cliched idea, but Corbijn's visuals are so lovely, the films pacing so languid and patient in its portrayal of star George Clooney's quiet routine, that it acquires a sort of hypnotic power. Clooney is perhaps the film's greatest flaw, dampening down his own charisma but unable to shake the baggage of his own persona - I kept on expecting him to grin. If I say that this is basically The Limits of Control minus any sense of humour, you will understand that I mean in as a compliment..

Monsters (Gareth Edwards) -
Forget the sci-fi element for a moment. What is most impressive in this low budget British film is director Gareth Edwards' superb eye. The long passages as his characters travel through Central America are illuminated by his ability to pull beautiful tableaux from out of the air. He observes reality, and enhances its beauty with his camera, an exciting talent in a young director. Meanwhile, his script and actors are fine, his high concept sells itself, and that climactic scene with the aliens at the Petrol station is genuinely awesome, and somehow, even moving.




Somewhere (Sofia Coppola) -
I love Sofia Coppola's aesthetic: her poetic realism is delicate, nicely observed and generally perfectly judged. Sure, her films are all studies of birds in gilded cages, but she is plainly intelligent enough to realise this, which is perhaps what helps her prevent them from becoming utterly insufferable. Here her subtle wit and the quiet, clever performances of her leads make this sketch flicker to life then snuff itself out again without leaving much impression beyond her command of atmosphere and visual style, though the ambiguous ending seemed exceptionally bleak to my mind.

Inception (Christopher Nolan) -
The great thing about Chris Nolan is his ambition. Warners give him untold Millions to make them a new blockbuster, and he spends it on a 2.5 hour maddeningly complex and personal action/heist thriller. Rather that than a third Transformers film for most people, I would imagine.
Nolan has the control and skill to enable him to bring his ambitious visions to the screen. Moreover he does it in the context of massive action spectacles, which is an odd but laudable position for a filmmaker to adopt. But it is a problem, too. Because Nolan is not a good director of action. Take, for example, the zero-gravity battle at the heart of Inception, between Joseph Gordon Levitt and a henchman, spinning and flying through the turning Hotel corrdiors. That should be an amazing, unforgettable scene, an action scene stuffed with images and ideas you have never seen before. Only its not, its just ok. The imagery is fine, but the action does not have the impact expected of spectacle at this high level. The later arctic battle becomes tedious within minutes. His Batman films suffer from the same problem, which is surely some sort of crime in a film about a character renowned for his combat acumen. Here, its a minor issue against the many other conversation points presented by the film. But it niggles at me, still.

How To Train Your Dragon (Dean DeBlois & Chris Sanders) -
Dreamworks Animation, from the inauspicious beginning of Shrek, has become a Studio producing
absolute top quality Heroic fantasy films for pre-teens. Kung Fu Panda was a joyous entertainment, and this is even better, stuffed with wit, filled with brilliantly conceived and executed action sequences, and peopled with memorable characters. Few of the blockbusters aimed at "adults" in the last year worked as well at delivering thrills and laughs as part of a satisfying narrative. Plus, this - reflecting the role played by Roger Deakins as visual advisor - looks totally beautiful throughout.

Also of Note:

Shutter Island, Solomon Kane, Robin Hood, Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans, Winters Bone, Down Terrace, Restrepo, Exit Through the Gift Shop, Buried, Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World, Sons of Cuba, Gentlemen Broncos, Four Lions, Lebanon, Splice, Black Dynamite, Police; Adjective, Secret of Kells, Repo Men, Revanche

Films I missed that might have figured in this list:

Certified Copy, Please Give, Our Beloved Month of August, A Single Man, Father of My Children, Scouting Book for Boys, Lourdes, Beeswax, Life During Wartime, 24 City, Vincere, Wild Grass, Gainsbourg, Mother, Cyrus

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

10 from Marty

In the Observer recently, to mark the release of Shutter Island, Jason Solomons picks "The 10 Best Martin Scorsese moments". Its an irritatingly stupid list, not quite personal enough to excuse its omissions, not quite definitive enough to justify its strange inclusions. Who but a commitee could pick the actual "10 Best" moments from Scorsese's extraordinary career? I could pick 10 moments from Taxi Driver alone, or from Raging Bull. The only way to make such a piece in any way interesting or compelling, then, is to make your selections personal, then explain how and why you've chosen them. Instead we get "Scorsese Wins an Oscar for The Departed" and his "Bad" video for Michael Jackson. Would anybody really rate Scorsese winning a desultory Academy Award for a film which is far from his best work as a sop for all those times he should have won as a best moment? Anybody besides a Guardian journalist trying to fill up numbers on a lazy top 10 list, that is...

Anyway, an alternative list. More personal, I think, and more interesting, I hope:



- A Personal Journey Through American Cinema
As Scorsese's work as a director of motion pictures has lost some of its quality and vibrancy, so he has branched out and become involved in other areas. He makes documentaries, for example. He is involved in the restoration of old films. He acts, he produces, he publicises films he loves. It is as a documentary-maker that he is perhaps seen in his best light. His brilliant A Personal Journey with Martin Scorsese through American Movies was made for the BFI and shown on Channel 4 in 1995. Its four hours long in all, and Scorsese dips in and out of dozens of films he loves from Hollywood's Golden Age, commenting, dissecting, rhapsodizing, and sometimes just letting a clip run because its so damn good. If nothing else, after watching this you will want to see many Classic films and previously neglected B-movies in their entirety. But Scorsese is a great talker and his love for cinema shines through whenever he speaks about it. Add that to the fact that he has chosen these excerpts and edited them together into this mammoth essay, and you can imagine that it is a great piece of visual entertainment, too, allowing for the many moments when its just Scorsese in black tie addressing the camera in that staccato way of his. Scorsese breaks directors down into three categories: Illusionist (D.W. Griffith, Murnau), Smuggler (Sam Fuller, Douglas SIrk) and Iconoclast (Chaplin, Kubrick, Welles) and ends his arguments around 1970, when he first began making films. He also addresses the depths and importance of the work of some near-forgotten directors: the incredibly prolific pioneer Allan Dwan, for instance. My only criticism of this film is that he never got around to making a sequel, covering 1970 - 2010. I would love to see his takes on Michael Mann, Spike Lee, Wes Anderson and David Lynch, among others. He has, however, made My Voyage to Italy, covering Italian cinema, which is excellent, and is still working on a companion piece on British Cinema. If you love movies, then you need to see this. Its available on a BFI DVD and much of it is on YouTube in big chunks.



- The opening of Mean Streets
Solomons chooses a scene - an undeniably fantastic scene, too - from Mean Streets (1973), but the moment which best announces Scorsese's great talent is the very first scene of the film. Scorsese's camera finds a just-woken Harvey Keitel sitting up in bed in what looks to be cold dawn light. He rises, studies himself in the mirror, then lies down again, the camera feet from him and steady throughout. As his head strikes the pillow, the familiar bass drum intro of the Ronettes' "Be My Baby" kicks in and we get treated to Super-8 scenes as the credits roll. It feels somehow revolutionary even from thirty-five years remove. Here is a film which is going to be personal, intimate, introverted, searching, a film not afraid to depict this unknown man in his vest in a darkened room studying himself in the mirror as its opening gambit, as if it were a Bressonion character study, as if it hadn't been made with money from Roger Corman. And yet, here is also a film made with an energy and style that recalls the earliest days of the Nouvelle Vague - signalled by the cut just as Keitel's head hits that pillow and that Phil Spector production rumbles in, the cut of a born filmmaker, and also by the device of the home movies over the credits. And the music! Scorsese, along with George Lucas in American Grafitti, would transfrom the use of pop music in cinema, and that is perhaps his greatest legacy. "Be My Baby" was its first expression, and it remains one of his finest.




- Cape Fear
Cape Fear (1991) was the first Scorsese film I saw with some awareness of what I was about to see. I was 16, and really beginning to discover Cinema properly for the first time after an adolescence devoted to music and comics and genre fiction. I knew that this was a film by a serious, acclaimed director, I'd seen Goodfellas and would soon binge on the earlier masterpieces, and I was able to concentrate on it as a piece of visual storytelling on that first viewing, in a packed-out Dublin Cinema (the Adelphi, which no longer exists and where the Beatles made their only ever Irish appearance in 1963). It was perhaps the first time that I understood how a director could tell an entertaining tale and do it with great visual style. Perhaps the first time that I noticed recurring techniques in editing and composition and camera movement. Perhaps the first time - aside from Spielberg films, and they are a different and equally fascinating case - that I was aware of a directors authorial signature as a film unfolded. Needless to say, I was absolutely blown away. Not only by Scorsese's evident artistry (though nowadays I realise it was more like craftsmanship) but by that incredible Bernard Herrman score, taken from the 1962 J. Lee Thompson original, and by an impressive cast including a Nick Nolte playing against type, the ever-wonderful Jessica Lange, a young Juliette Lewis as good as she would ever be, and most memorably, Robert DeNiro chewing ham and scenery and still absolutely terrifying as the horror movie villain of the piece, Max Cady.
On more recent viewing, Cape Fear is revealed as minor Scorsese. He swapped projects with Spielberg, who had developed Cape Fear, exchanging Schindlers List for it, and there is still a whiff of that alien sensibility in its portrayal of a family in peril from an implacable monster. Its also the film that Shutter Island most obviously resembles, in its unabashed desire to thrill and scare. Scorsese as entertainer, throwing in whip-pans and shock cuts and homages to keep himself interested.
As such it works beautifully. It is atmospheric, gripping, darkly funny, and sensitive in its characterisation and handling of the tensions between these people. It also received a quite beautiful skit from the Simpsons with "Cape Feare", in 1993, one of the greatest ever episodes from that great series.



- The Last Temptation of Christ
Possibly Scorsese's most underrated film, there are a number of reasons to love The Last Temptation of Christ (1988). A mature, realist take on the story based on Nikos Kazantzakis' novel, it refers to past Bible films on a few obvious occasions. Most blatant is the shot from the top of Jesus' cross Scorsese favours as the cross is raised, a more or less direct lift from Nick Ray's King of Kings (1961) (see above). The production design and locations, meanwhile, are reminiscent of Pasolini's The Gospel According to St. Matthew (1964). Scorsese also casts his actors the way Ray might have done - British actors play the Romans while Americans play the Disciples. But where in Ray's day those Brits would have all been RSC actors, here Scorsese casts contemporary actors. This means we get David Bowie as Pontius Pilate, cockney Centurions, and a miscast Harvey Keitel as a bizarre Judas. Scorsese's style is pared down and minimalist as a result of his small budget and a hurried shoot under pressure in Morocco, and that brings a different sort of intensity to the material - he seems more focused, his storytelling somehow purer and more in keeping with the material . Christ's time in the desert and his three temptations are eerie and disturbing, Willem Dafoe is extraordinary as Jesus, and Peter Gabriel's soundtrack - which was massively important in popularizing World Music in the West - is brilliant and groundbreaking. The controversy around the film was ridiculous and has damaged its reputation by association. But it needs to be seen.



- "Did you fuck my wife?" from Raging Bull
As Quentin Tarantino has pointed out, if you listened to an audience reacting in a cinema to this scene from Raging Bull (1980), you would conclude that they were watching a comedy.
I think its probably Scorsese's finest film, but its a brutal watch, so harrowing in its emotional content, so operatic in its violence. But beautiful, exhilarating, poetic and funny too. The boxing bears little resemblance to boxing, but its great cinema, which is more important.
A snatch of the scene in question:
Jake: Did you fuck my wife?
Joey: What?
Jake: Did you fuck my wife?
Joey: [pauses] How do you ask me that? I'm your brother and you ask me that? Where do you get you're balls big enough to ask me that?
Jake: I'm gonna ask you again, did you or didn't you? Just answer the question.
Joey: I'm not gonna answer that. It's stupid. It's a sick question and you're a sick fuck and I'm not that sick that I'm gonna answer it. I'm leaving, If Nora calls tell her I went home. You know what you should do? Do a little more fucking and a little less eating, so you don't have to blame it all on me and everybody else, you understand me? You're cracking up! Ya' fucking screw ball ya'!




- Light and the The Age of Innocence
I find The Age of Innocence (1993) Scorsese's most moving film. Its also one of his most ostentatious in various particulars - featuring a lushly beautiful Elmer Bernstein score, incredibly busy art direction and costume and set design and some golden Michael Ballhaus cinematography. Even the cast, full of plummy British character actors, has a certain ripeness. But Scorsese brilliantly captures the power of Edith Wharton's superb novel and his film builds and builds through a series of magnificently mounted set pieces (obvious in their debt to Visconti's The Leopard) to a devastating set of final scenes wherein everything is resolved, unhappily. The screenshot above originates in a pivotal scene in which Daniel Day-Lewis' protagonist, Newland Archer, lets himself off the hook by refusing a choice, ascribing that decision to chance rather than actually having to make it, and in doing so dooms himself to a life of settled discontent and disappointment. The blinding reflections of the sun off the sea dominate the visual impression left by the scene and Archer - whose view the camera shares - makes that sight a part of his decision, as if implicating the very beauty of Scorsese's film. Archer decides to reject that beauty and the beautiful woman at the centre of it, a woman he loves, because of social convention. Its a fine example of Scorsese's genius for unifying image and content, as is the Parisian coda, with its transcendent flash of light from an upstairs window.



- "Can't You Hear Me Knocking" in Casino
Scorsese's films grow with each viewing, as is the case with many great directors. This means that I'm often lukewarm to them the first time I see them. I hated Casino (1995) when I saw it in a cinema. It seemed an interminable Goodfellas knock-off, and possibly the most self-indulgent, excessive thing Scorsese had ever done. But when I watched it again on DVD a few years later I instantly got it - the visual excess reflecting the setting and themes, the Goodfellas elements undeniable and yet richer and with more depth than in that first, dazzling if superficial film, DeNiro and Pesci as great as ever, Sharon Stone the best she's ever been. And that soundtrack. I've written about my love of the Rolling Stones "Can't You Hear Me Knocking" here before, and Scorsese is a massive Stones fan (as his direction of the so-so Shine A Light film from a few years back attests). He uses a handful of Stones songs in Casino, and the montage of discovered bodies set to "Gimme Shelter" is sublime, but the montage to which he fixes "Cant You Hear Me Knocking" is among the greatest scenes he ever directed.
There are so many things to admire in the scene: the way it begins as a series of moving shots, pans, dollies and zooms of varying speeds. The ease of the voiceovers, as if in conversation with one another. That opening shot, beginning with imagery straight from a Western (a cow skull against timber) and ending with Pesci's "desperados". The many hilarious exchanges. Every single time Pesci utters the word "fuck". The obvious but inevitable and effective visual comedy of his waddle beside the statuesque showgirl and the payoff in his car. The numerous cameos - characters briefly encountered before the film moves on, including a jeweller bemoaning his loss, bellboys and secretaries, a politician at dinner, policemen whose lunches have been ruined, and even the victims of his home invasions who have their pictures turned down so their eyes can't witness the robberies.
For me it surpasses the justly celebrated "Layla" montage in Goodfellas.




- Visual beauty in Taxi Driver
Considering how rough and grimy and awful it makes New York City in the 1970s look, Taxi Driver (1976) is a quite exceptionally beautiful film. Scorsese finds these images and that dirty scuzziness falls away before the acuity of his eye. He works a particularly profitable line in the contrast between the shiny yellow of the cab and the neon reds of the lights of the city nightscape, and also with the cyans and sicklier greens of streetlights on deserted alleys and tenement blocks. The only real break from these images of nocturnal beauty are the sequences set in the campaign office where the Albert Brooks and Cybil Shepherd characters work, which are always light and airy. Scorsese's use of colour is generally distinctive and marked by his appreciation for Michael Powell - those bold reds! - in their heightened realism.
Then there is the famous mobility of his camera. The most celebrated example of that is the gods eye crawl through the room after Travis' climactic rampage, but a more subtle and effective example is the moment where the camera drifts away from Travis as he talks on a payphone to take in a featureless, seemingly irrelevant hallway, as if Scorsese and the camera itself are rejecting this alienated protagonist, an outsider in his own film.



- Funny How? from Goodfellas
When your average filmgoer thinks about Martin Scorsese - if they ever do - what they think about is Goodfellas (1990). His influence in modern cinema is most obviously apparent in the series of films slavishly devoted to its specific genius. Films like Ted Demme's Blow (2001) and Paul Thomas Anderson's Boogie Nights (1997) or Mereilles and Lund's City of God (2002), the last two of which surpass Scorsese's film in quality in my view, all of which feature long rambling narratives told with with an abundance of stylistic devices (jump cuts, freeze frames, captions, slow motion etc) and foregrounded soundtracks filled with vintage rock and pop music. Many of the young directors who emerged in the 1990s were indebted to it in terms of its self-conscious presentation of the director as star - from Tarantino and Danny Boyle to Guy Ritchie and Wes Anderson.
And it is a thrilling cinematic experience. Scorsese knows and understands his medium and can harness its power as well as any director working in the world today. He brings the many techniques he utilises to bear without it ever really feeling like pointless style, successfully integrating every device into the narrative or his storytelling.
For all that, I have massive problems with the absence of sympathetic characters and the titilating, shallow way it skims across its subject matter without ever really illuminating much about these people. The Sopranos, another piece of pop culture that probably would not exist were it not for Scorsese's film, suggests that there are depths to this world that Goodfellas never acknowledges.
For me, what really works in Goodfellas is a quality at the heart of every great mob movie: tension. There is the relentless dread, the awareness of imminent violence that must exist in such an environment. We are in a world where everyone is vulnerable, and Scorsese even addresses this tension in the second half of the film, where the fall follows the rise and characters start to get whacked. Nobody is safe, and paranoia becomes the films main topic, its editing rhythms and camera movements matching this jittery, nervous energy.
Any scene featuring Joe Pesci's Tommy is made doubly tense purely because of his hair-trigger presence. The scene where he shoots Spider dead due to a tiny personal slight offers a pay-off to that, but the biggest tease is the "Funny how?" scene, where he winds up Ray Liotta's Henry, exploiting his own fearsome image. Its hilarious, unbearably tense and utterly terrifying all at once, and Nicolas Pileggi's script is brilliant:

Henry: You're really funny.
Tommy : What do you mean I'm funny?
Henry: It's funny, you know. It's a good story, it's funny, you're a funny guy.
[laughs]
Tommy : What do you mean, you mean the way I talk? What?
Henry : It's just, you know. You're just funny, it's... funny, the way you tell the story and everything.
Tommy : [it becomes quiet] Funny how? What's funny about it?
Anthony: Tommy no, You got it all wrong.
Tommy : Oh, oh, Anthony. He's a big boy, he knows what he said. What did ya say? Funny how?
Henry: Jus...
Tommy: What?
Henry : Just... ya know... you're funny.
Tommy: You mean, let me understand this cause, ya know maybe it's me, I'm a little fucked up maybe, but I'm funny how, I mean funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I'm here to fuckin' amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how? How am I funny?
Henry : Just... you know, how you tell the story, what?
Tommy: No, no, I don't know, you said it. How do I know? You said I'm funny. How the fuck am I funny, what the fuck is so funny about me? Tell me, tell me what's funny!
Henry : [long pause] Get the fuck out of here, Tommy!
Tommy : [everyone laughs] Ya motherfucker! I almost had him, I almost had him. Ya stuttering prick ya. Frankie, was he shaking? I wonder about you sometimes, Henry. You may fold under questioning.



- Life Lessons
The first part of the portmanteau film New York Stories (1989) (the other two parts are by Woody Allen and Francis Ford Coppola), Scorsese's short is a near-perfect piece and one of the best films aver made about being an artist. Written by the great Richard Price it follows Lional Dobie (Nick Nolte), an acclaimed abstract artist, as he prepares for a big new exhibition and his relationship with his assistant and lover (Rosanna Arquette) collapses. Its easily the finest chapter in the film - smart, satirical and unexpectedly powerful, its a fine character study of an egotistical artist and the way he chews up people as raw material. Viewed in the context of Scorsese's career, it looks like a prologue to what would be a decade of great revival. If the 80s had been a bad decade for him as a director (and they surely had, for all that none of his films from that decade is exactly bad), then the Last Temptation of Christ, as spartan and realist and minimalist as it is, can be seen as a palate-cleanser. Life Lessons, in contrast, is full of the tricks and stylistic flourishes which would fill Goodfellas - it feels like Scorsese was warming up.
He also seems unusually emotionally invested in the material, but then he surely understands the demands of making a life in art, of the sacrifices and pretensions one must encounter. He draws a great performance from Nolte, and the film is full of other pleasures - Nestor Almendros' splendid photography captures the massive modern art that fills the screen and makes it live and vibrate as Nolte throws himself and paint upon it. Scorsese excels at shooting some scenes subjectively so that the world narrows down to the way Dobie sees it - when he speaks to a woman and feels attraction we see inserts of various parts of her body; her neck, her ear, her lips, her toes. Thus the unsympathetic Dobie is rendered sympathetic and even somewhat heroic in his devotion to his true calling. Steve Buscemi plays a performance artist who cuckolds Nolte and his art is shown - basically a stand-up routine about being assaulted, delivered beautifully by Buscemi, who wrote it. And then there is the music - Dobie works with paint-smeared cassette taps blaring in his studio and so the film is full of Dylan and the Band, and perhaps most memorably, Procul Harum's lovely "A Whiter Shade of Pale". As Scorsese films go, its relatively underseen, which is a damn shame.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Ten Television Dramas from the Last Decade

At some point during the years 2000-2010, some critics decided that we were living through a "Golden Age" of American Television Drama. And you know what? I think they were right. American TV has produced some amazing shows over the last ten years, driven mainly by the success of HBO's original programming, which seemed to stimulate the American Networks and the other subscription channels to raise their game while producing their own programming. This means that while there is still a lot of crap on TV, the general standard has risen steadily. And the cream of the crop is visual storytelling as good as any produced in cinema or tv over the last half-century.
A Top Ten:


1. The Wire (2002 - 2008)
Obviously. But then some - many? - prefer The Sopranos. The Wire was better for longer, more consistent, more human and interested, more moving and funnier than any other television show I've ever seen. The first three Seasons long arc of a narrative is worth all those comparisons to Dickens and Zola and even Shakespeare. Richness of character, fantastic writing and acting, a defined, distinctive visual identity, and a sickening, riveting relevance to the way we live now were just some of the reasons. Season 4 was a beautiful reinvention and if Season 5 was a slight slip in quality - which it most certainly was - then it was still better than 99.9% of everything else on TV. Books have been written about this show, and will continue to be written. I've said it here before, but The Wire is the greatest work of fiction of the last decade in any medium, for my money. And thats worth saying again.


2. Mad Men (2007 - )
Every episode dense with thematic and narrative detail, each performance an exquisitely precise marvel of emotional repression (and sometimes, release), the period styling so lovely it can be almost a distraction, the storytelling confident and sensitive, subtle and thrilling: this show addresses the making of our world, masculinity, the battle of the sexes, the culture wars, and much else besides. It is also as gripping a soap opera as has been produced over the last few years, and its cast and writing are superb.


3. Deadwood (2004 - 2006)
Shakespearian richness of character and dialogue, ultraviolence, whores, whisky, shootouts in the main street, Indian warriors, lovely photography, character actors in every corner of each frame, plague, grizzled old prospectors, satanic millionaires, Swearengen, chinatown, poker, boot hill, a russian telegram operator, opium, the best and most brutal fight scene I've ever seen on television, Wyatt Earp, Gustavo Santoalalla's "Iguazu" put to devastating use, plot twists always founded firmly in character, a creepy, hilarious Hotel owner, Wild Bill Hickock. Great show.


4. The Sopranos (1999 - 2007)
It would be higher, if only it hadn't coasted for three Seasons between Seasons 3 and 6. It was still brilliant, of course. But the standard it had set in those first two seasons was so incredibly high that it was impossible to maintain, bar for one episode or so a Season. Too much great material has already been written about this immense Series for me to add anything. If you haven't see it, what are you waiting for?


5. Band of Brothers (2001)
Epic and unashamedly sentimental in parts, this series truly sends the audience on a journey with its characters. A horrific, traumatic, oddly beautiful journey from Normandy to the Wolf's Nest, that is. Stuffed with great performances from a rising cast and centred on a handful of extraordinary episodes, Band of Brothers is pitiless in its portrayal of the horrors of War, and yet it is no less intent on portraying the bonds and camaraderie of its protagonists who grow and develop as people as the War progresses. Brilliantly shot and written, it knocks the likes of Saving Private Ryan into a cocked hat. Yes, its a hagiography, but its never sentimental about its characters, and the appearances of interview clips with the real life men - now elderly veterans - grounds it and provides a resonance much fiction reaches desperately for but never grasps.


6. Friday Night Lights (2006 - )
A portrait of a Texan town where High School football is the unifying factor, allowing the narrative to follow a diverse and fascinating cast of characters, including students, coaches, parents and friends. This device also allows the show to address some big topics - religion, the Economy, politics, Class. But it does this subtly, lightly, never tubthumping or axe-grinding. It just observes and reports. The cast is fabulous, the setting beautifully evoked, and when all else fails, the football stories propel the narrative onwards, treating territory which usually demands cliche sensitively. The cliches are still there - those cliches are founded in real sport, after all, with characteristic situations like victory from the jaws of defeat and plenty of inspirational speeches - but they are so well executed, written and performed with such conviction and emotional intensity, that they transcend the genre. More importantly, they always serve a purpose in terms of character or theme. We learn about these people in these games, we watch them grow and fail. This means that this show has characters I care about more than almost any other, which makes it - a slight wobble in the Second Season aside - compulsive viewing.


7. Generation Kill (2008)
Theres something perfect about Generation Kill. Brilliantly made and acted, it provides a faultlessly immersive experience of combat at the dawn of the second Gulf War. It follows a Recon Platoon as they drive in Humvees into enemy territory ahead of the main invading force in the early weeks of the War. Its a portrait of the daily existence of the Marines as they deal with Iraqi civilians, enemy combatants, the world back home, and their own command structure. It is a brilliant, hilarious workplace comedy, where the employees struggle constantly with idiotic orders and incompetent superiors. A fine evocation of camaraderie and brotherhood and the tensions accompanying such under intolerable pressure. A thrilling story of men in war. The cast - mainly unknowns - are extraordinary, to the extent that seeing any of them in any other show or film is a jolting experience, because they are Marines in Iraq to me. Its directed with style and muscle, and is a better treatment of Iraq than just about any film on the subject, except perhaps for The Hurt Locker. I wish there were more than one Season.


8. Lost (2004-2010)
As the big Network escapist shows go, Lost is as classy as it gets. I understand people losing patience with its interminable hinting and loose ends, but its premise is arresting enough, its storytelling assured and stylish enough, its production glossy and beautiful enough to make up for that. Its a cliche, but every episode of Lost feels like a big blockbuster movie; you can see the money onscreen. Partly thats the location work, partly the strong cast, and partly the impressive spectacle - this show always features big action scenes and foregrounded special effects. But the narrative is compelling, the disaster movie tropes (a disparate cast of characters, each with his or her own problem, secret or dilemma, which affects the group dynamic and situation) working brilliantly over the duration of a long-running series, where characters can be thoroughly explored and interrogated.
Yes, its frequently ridiculous, but like much great sci-fi, it uses its more fantastic elements to explore some weighty themes, even if it does tend to skate the surface rather than plumb the depths. And as a genre show, it is commendably straightfaced and fullblooded, dealing with this material - monsters, time travel, miracles etc - without irony or intentional camp. The difficulty inherent in such an enterprise is obvious in the failure of its many imitators - Heroes and FlashForward being the most high-profile - to approach Lost's quality or success.


9. Six Feet Under (2001-2005)
Its obviously difficult for any show to maintain its quality over a run of more than two or three Seasons. New characters and storylines have to be integrated without altering the chemistry which gave the show its initial success. Six Feet Under suffered more than most from this problem, losing its way horrendously in its third and fourth Seasons, when its melodramatic elements overwhelmed the storylines and the characters. It recovered well for its final Season, but it would be a lot higher up this list if it had been as good as its first two Seasons for its entire lifespan. Those first Seasons were incredible - a soap opera with a streak of profundity running through it, dealing with the way people handle mortality and the deaths of loved ones week in and week out while juggling a fine cast playing damaged, realistic, truthful people struggling through small, flawed little lives of disappointment and fleeting happiness. If that sounds bleak, it often was. But it was also funny, often in a surreal way, effortlessly moving, and as intelligent and thoughtfully crafted as anything HBO has ever done.


10. Occupation (2009)
In 1999 the BBC broadcast Peter Kosminsky and Leigh Jackson's remarkable Warriors, a drama following a peacekeeping Unit of the British army during the War in the former Yugoslavia. Aside from uncovering a couple of stars - Matthew MacFadden, Damien Lewis and Ioan Gruffyd all had major parts - it was a sensitive, thought-provoking and immensely moving piece of work, and probably the best treatment of that conflict in art from outside Yugoslavia. In 2009, the BBC seemed almost to bookend a decade with the broadcast of Occupation, Nick Murphy and Peter Bowker's drama following three British Soldiers through the Iraq War and occupation, and detailing their experiences in the aftermath. Unblinking, and as such, more than a little depressing, the series reflected the War from various different angles, showing us the experiences of soldiers, mercenaries, medics and civilians in both Iraq and teh Uk, but it always shows Basra as a theatre for brutality and suffering. The cast, relatively starry for British tv, is superb, Murphy's direction atmospheric and displaying a lovely eye, and Bowker's script marks him out as perhaps the finest writer in British television today, capable of writing such a political drama but also capable of making it gripping, sporadically funny and utterly emotionally effecting.


Close but no Cigar: Rome, Sons of Anarchy, The Unit, Red Riding, The Devils Whore, Spiral, Party Animals, The West Wing, John from Cincinnati, From the Earth to the Moon, True Blood, Bodies, Britz, To The Ends of the Earth.

Labels: ,